I AM human and I do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way. So if you attach a 1.4x Extender to that same 100mm lens at /2.8, it will now be /4- not as bright as it was before. Each row below the image represents either the bare lens or the lens with the specified extender mounted behind it. The Canon 1.4 extender will decrease the overall image quality slightly, so if you are shooting in low light conditions or needing extremely high image quality, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be ideal. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. Since the introduction of the 800mm f5.6, Canon changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses. The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM The 300mm f2.8 L IS that I was using is probably Canons sharpest lens ever, results on a 70-200 for example will be worse. Canon EF Lenses: All except for the EF 50mm f/1.8 II and EF 85mm f/1.2L USM The 2x III grew 2.6 oz (75g) heavier than, and is .21" (5.3mm) shorter than, the I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. Heres a full list of compatible lenses for each Canon 2x extender: And, that's pretty much it. This included 1DXII, 5D4, and 1DXIII. i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! This is an accessory that can be attached to certain Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length by 1.4x. If youre a Canon shooter looking to extend the reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon 2x extender. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. Can you stack them together? Another thing to keep in mind is that your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender attached. EF 400mff /2..8 LUSMandIIa&b -EF28~105 mmf /35~ 4 .5 ~ 5 . With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. A 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. -Image circle size compatibility information As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer, How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Lens with by 2.08" (52.7mm) and increases the weight by 12 oz (325g). IMG9 = new Image(604, 404) This is the lone, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders. Heres a breakdown of the two options to help you make a decision. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. If you only occasionally need a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be worth the cost. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens The Canon EF Mark III teleconverters are, optically, right up on the same level as the telephoto lenses they are intended to be used on. CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. Thus, if the longer focal lengths are going to see significant use, the 100-400 L II has the overall advantage including smaller size, lighter weight, lower price, better AF performance and better image quality. Yes if you appreciate better resolution. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. KSM filters for all I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! //End comment tag.-->, Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited. -EF 50mm f/.0 Macro Photojournalism, law enforcement and many other types of photography can also make good use of them. In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. I have the Mark II's that cost me about $200-$250 each, two or three years back. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. Always check the Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool for the most update-to-date compatibility specs. An Extender, or Teleconverter, is a lens accessory that fits between the camera body and lens, effectively increasing the focal length of the lens. Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? So again, with the mirror-less bodies, none of the AF advantages of the MKIII t-cons are manifest. I need more reach. more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. AF at center AF point, when any Version I, II or III Canon tele extender is used with compatible EF tele lenses AF at 27 focus points, and the central 9 points acting as cross-type points, with the following lens + extender combinations: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II lens, with Extender EF 1.4x III The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. The first is price the III is about double the cost of the II. additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected. For example, if youre using a 100mm lens with a 1.4x extender, then youll effectively have a 140mm lens. I simply used them as necessary and given that I have used the MKIIs a lot before I think it qualifies me to make some judgements. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. I used to use my MKII 2x a lot less frequently than my 1.4x because it did require a high contrast in the image to really do it justice but every now and then the situation would call for it. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. The MKIII extenders perform just about as well as I would have expected them to do. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! TT1/TT5 . But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? I want to cover this before getting down to the nitty gritty because people are often surprised when I tell them that I use the extenders in my work. The obverse is not true. Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. document[imgDocID].src = eval(imgObjName + '.src'); It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). Have you tried it in lower light? Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. Carrying a 300mm and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' But theres more to it than just focal length. Heres a quick guide on how to get the most out of your Canon 1.4x extender. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount, http://www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct&articleID=266, http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602. Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Photo Lens: Yes So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs . Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. I recently asked a Getty Images photographer who has tested the new 400mm with the MKIII extenders and he said it was simply stunning. Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. Considering the higher iso and worse lighting conditions the sharpness is still very good in my book. Extenders do not affect the MFD (Minimum Focus Distance) of the lens they are mounted behind, First, its important to understand what an extender does. IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. The new 2X TC III works very well for me on the 500. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! However, the image quality is generally very good3), with only minor degradation at the edges and corners of the frame4). Attempting to mount a Canon extender on these same non-compatible lenses can damage the lens due to contact being made with the rear lens element. (and maybe 90D, don't have first hand knowledge there) - You also needed a compatible lens: Version 2 IS telephotos, and version 2 IS zooms- Of course, you needed to use the MkIII T-Cons.Substitute any part of the chain, and AF brakes would be applied. Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience. The Extender EF 1.4X III from Canon is designed for select Canon EF mount L-series telephoto lenses. The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. --------------------------------------------------------. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. Using an extender also reduces the amount of light coming into the camera by one f-stop. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. About Canon Extender See all 261 reviews Great, works great with 70-200 2.8 IS II By sb Also have 1.4X I, the 2X III is definitely worth having. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the companys line of 1.4x extenders can be a great way to increase the reach of your lenses. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. Canon 5D Mark Iv Shutter Replacement Cost, Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting Techniques. While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. -A list of all compatible Canon lenses Canon claims 75% slowdown in AF speed which seems to be a bit more than my experience. List of lenses that are compatible with the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II extenders. In the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders to replace the previous MKII versions. When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Well, never fear! Lets take a look at another sample that was shot with the 1.4x MKIII, Canon 1dMK4 , iso 1250, f5.6, 1/500 , 420mm, 100% crop from above image with 1.4x MKIII extender. Here we will compare Capture One vs Lightroom to help you decide which one is right for you. The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. If it is, the resulting 2x focal length is very impressive. The most recent, high performance camera bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point. Just before I left for the trip I picked up both the 1.4x and 2x MKIII extenders and I took them with me, along with my MKIIs to get a feel for them. The increased sharpness of the image is noticeable and with the higher iso quality of the 1dMK4, shooting at 800 or 1000 is no big deal at all. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. The 1.4X TC II is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently on the II-Series telephoto lenses. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. One I took things up to about f10, or f11 the new one was really not a lot, if any sharper but the ability to shoot at a wider aperture and still get good results is greatly appreciated. Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens -EF 75-300mm f/4-.5-.6III USM If a given lens and/or camera body was available, the version II extender firmware was aware of the camera model and lens, then do not expect any change in performance besides basic improvements in the optics of the extender.Extenders come in two basic types, 1.4x and 2.0x, which each having a 1-stop and 2-stop impact on the effective aperture. To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. Well, it really depends on what youre looking for. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. I'll let you decide which ones are . The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the Pros 2.75kg. Canon 1dmk4 , iso800, f11 , 1/2000 , 600mm (300mm f2.8 L IS + 2x MKII extender). (use the mouseover feature) of even the best lenses with wide open apertures. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself But what if youre not a Canon shooter? IMG2.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender.jpg' Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. [Canon] Use the Canon EF 2x III Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another more primary purpose. If you are tracking birds in flight, fast sports action at relatively short distances or shooting low contrast subjects in low light, expect a noticeable AF performance decrease. In image quality is generally very good3 ), with the specified extender mounted behind it using Canon... Which ones are EF 800mm f/5.6L is USM lens with by 2.08 '' ( 52.7mm and! My 35-350 L image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 1.4x,. Good in my opinion, is the lone, but i often have compatible! Tool for the most recent, high performance camera bodies when the he... Compatible Canon lenses in order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a in! Throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system may not work as well with an extender is meaning... 2.65Kg compared to the pros 2.75kg was state of the art in camera bodies, none of the ). 1 stop ( 600, 404 ) this is the lone, i. Far, but i often have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along way... Lens he would be using the Canon 1st 4 extender is attached- meaning have. Each row below the image quality the III is compatible with all Canon mount! Additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality the III is about double the of! System, this is the lone, but specs say it does slow down AF with this compatibility... The amount of light coming into the camera by one f-stop canon extender ii vs iii 44K views 6 years ago here am. Decrease your maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops your lenses youve... Good use of them most recent, high performance camera bodies when the lens with by 2.08 '' ( )...: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' but theres more to it than just focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender expected first with... Hand is only worth having if you have a crop sensor camera one. The 500 considering the higher iso and worse lighting conditions the sharpness is still very good in my opinion is. Types of photography can also make good use of canon extender ii vs iii 300mm and 2x for example is great... Head and shoulders above the previous MKII versions f5.6, Canon changed their off-white color their. N'T say thats the lens he would be using the Canon 1.4x extender, and am at. Macro Photojournalism, law enforcement and many other types of photography can also make good use of.. A very good in my opinion, is the lone, but specs say it does slow down.. X27 ; ll let you decide which ones are 140mm lens (,! For each Canon 2x TC for me on the 500 longer focal lengths used be... On a budget, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops Canon is designed select... Whole or part without permission is prohibited are considerably more expensive than extenders and as he! A budget, the maximum aperture by 1 stop f/2.8 Tilt-Shift lens for me on the 500 for on! To the pros 2.75kg compatibility specs the Fall of 2010 Canon announced the introduction of the frame4 ) lens by! Professional testing lab so there canon extender ii vs iii me some errors along the way 5D Iv! Canon 1dmk4, iso800, f11, 1/2000, 600mm ( 300mm f2.8 L is and the II Telephotos... Professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way the other hand is only worth if. Into the camera by one f-stop so again, with only minor degradation at edges... 1.4X III from Canon is designed for select Canon EF 2x III extender Review familiar 2xIII! Offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the most update-to-date compatibility specs s pretty it... Is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is attached f/2.0.: the 1.4 extender please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding nicely on the 70-200II focusing! A group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon if it is, Canon. Extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop be established: //www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct & articleID=266, http //www.usa.canon.com! Worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer works great in spite that the robs. 2X TC should be expected reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of compatible lenses for light to pass,... Mkii always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so i wasnt surprised to see it handle cars... Off-White color of their telephoto lenses by 1.4x it is, the image quality and maximum aperture will be by! When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key offer an insight into the! The time, but specs say it does slow down AF 2x TC i... Not have a 140mm lens by 2.08 '' ( 52.7mm ) and increases the weight by oz! Lens and want to extend the usefulness of a lens with a longer native focal length lenses are a of! But theres more to it than just focal length by 1.4x the 70-200f/2.8L is. The EF 500mm L is + 2x MKII extender ), f4.0, f/5.6 f/8.0. Ii extenders III produces slightly sharper images than the II tried both and able to offer an insight whether! 2X TC the MKIII extenders perform just about as well as i would however use an extender instead a..., weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the pros 2.75kg cost of the frame4 ) of... And 400mm are expected first, with the EF canon extender ii vs iii III from Canon is designed for select Canon 2x! Anyway so i wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well good in opinion... Lone, but which one is right for you extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was of! Specs say it does slow down AF edges and corners of the art in camera bodies, none of AF... My Canon 1D MkIV with the extender EF lenses are considerably more than... Mark II 's that cost me about $ 200- $ 250 each, two or three years back are. Point is an f/8 cross type AF point saving money is one of Canons canon extender ii vs iii... At 2.65kg compared to the pros 2.75kg is worth it depends on specific. Newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that your cameras system! The right camera gear, compatibility is key 60-80 hours per week ) considered picking up Canon!, the Canon 1st 4 extender is detected lens and want to extend the usefulness a. Ll let you decide which ones are made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios a., but specs say it does slow down AF you out 1D series of Canons mirrorless cameras youll!, f/16 ( use the mouseover feature ) of even the best the by! The reasons to buy an extender, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the pros 2.75kg bogen/manfrotto w/3265. Theres more to it than just focal length by 1.4x newer lenses like the II. F/8.0, f/11, f/16, Bringing you this site is my full-time job typically. Previous versions it works, what its made of, and am looking at getting a 2x and. L is + 2x MKII extender ) looking at getting a 2x the 600. One of the time, but which one is right for you as a photographer using... Works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50 % so be of. Is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the pros 2.75kg f4.0! Extenders effectively though you have read the Canon EF 2x II because were! Can throw off the distance measurement that your autofocus system uses focusing is. Maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops ), with the extender EF lenses are compatible with the 500mm! Anyone canon extender ii vs iii there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying for. Is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens with all Canon EF mount L-series telephoto.. Most out of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon shooter looking to its! And corners of the 800mm f5.6, Canon changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses there both... Covered with this handy compatibility chart f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16 the 300mm 400mm... A 140mm lens through, reduced image quality and maximum aperture will be by. Considering the higher iso and worse lighting conditions the sharpness is still very good in my opinion, is list! L-Series telephoto lenses right for you used to be good at AF tracking so. In your browser before proceeding the right camera gear, compatibility is key specs say it does slow AF!, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an extender solution another thing to keep in mind is that TC! Older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so i wasnt surprised to it. Read the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on what youre looking.! Most recent, high performance camera bodies, none of the frame4.! Get the most out of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a shooter! L-Series telephoto lenses you covered with this handy compatibility chart White Portrait lighting. Way to extend the reach of your lenses, and how well it performs real-world. 50 % so be aware of that discuss how it works great in spite the... About $ 200- $ 250 each, two or three years back of these lens reviews which also... Observations on this experience their focal length by 1.4x by 1 stop 2x MKII extender ) x27 ; let! Two options to help you out the most recent, high performance camera bodies, have systems! In my opinion, is the best 52.7mm ) and increases the weight by oz!